About Me

My photo
The Original CHAUKIDAAR ,“TAKEOVER WATCHMAN” since 2007. CA. Arun Goenka* hands-on experience in the share market* deep knowledge of laws and account*one of the early players, pioneered an investment strategy in TAKEOVERS*The WIRC - of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, has honoured him with the ‘Recognition of CAs in Social Service’. * often invited by National business news; electronic and print media, for his views on SEBI related matters. * history of red-flagging 100+ cases to SEBI* contributes by giving inputs in drafting amendments to the regulation* Some of the suggestions reflected in subsequent regulatory changes: (a). In takeover of Cairn 3,750 Crores non-compete fees waived off and ultimately Removal of Non-compete fee in 2011 (b) November 2009 amending Regulation 11 (1). (c)Listing agreement baring promoters from voting on related party. (d) Disclosure of past performance by merchant bankers in case of IPO (e) SAST 2011 regulation 10(1)(h), (f) Counter Offer in case of Delisting (g) Interest payment to all in case of delays in Open Offers(05.06.20).

Monday, October 12, 2020

Delisting Counter Offer- should be fair to investors as well-Vedanta

Re. VERY URGENT AND IMMEDIATE PLEASE. Delisting Regulation- Vedanta

The apprehensions as expressed in my letters dated 4th July and 2nd July 2020, all came true. The massive delisting exercise, the biggest ever in the country is failing. This I feel also a failure of the SEBI Regulations to keep pace with the evolving situation.

Majority of the investors in the share market do not have such a long term vision or appetite as LIC . Many small investors are staring at a massive loss of their wealth. The share price of Vedanta has already slipped down from 140 to 112 and it's likely to go down further.

The counter offer process as it stands now, is unfair to the small shareholders. While the promoters get the second chance to revise their offer upwards, the shareholders do not get the chance to revise their bid downwards. A fair second chance should be given to both.

SEBI should allow counter offer to the Vedanta  promoter in case they are  willing to do so. The Delisting exercise was just a touch and go affair with numbers showing under 137 crores shares received, yet with confirmed bids the book  fell short of 134 crs. While you should investigate the reason for this mismatch and take appropriate action, you should permit the promoters to make a counter offer.

I have, in the past also, suggested that for allowing the counter offer, the crossing of threshold of 90% should not be made compulsory. As a matter of fact, the “discovered price” is not defined anywhere in the regulation and in the past it was taken as the price at which highest number of shares were offered(Alfa Laval delisting). It is against the interest of the small shareholders who are not given a second chance to revise their bids  lower.  The counter  offer  will give them this much demanded second chance.

No comments:

Post a Comment