About Me

My photo
The Original CHAUKIDAAR ,“TAKEOVER WATCHMAN” since 2007. CA. Arun Goenka* hands-on experience in the share market* deep knowledge of laws and account*one of the early players, pioneered an investment strategy in TAKEOVERS*The WIRC - of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, has honoured him with the ‘Recognition of CAs in Social Service’. * often invited by National business news; electronic and print media, for his views on SEBI related matters. * history of red-flagging 100+ cases to SEBI* contributes by giving inputs in drafting amendments to the regulation* Some of the suggestions reflected in subsequent regulatory changes: (a). In takeover of Cairn 3,750 Crores non-compete fees waived off and ultimately Removal of Non-compete fee in 2011 (b) November 2009 amending Regulation 11 (1). (c)Listing agreement baring promoters from voting on related party. (d) Disclosure of past performance by merchant bankers in case of IPO (e) SAST 2011 regulation 10(1)(h), (f) Counter Offer in case of Delisting (g) Interest payment to all in case of delays in Open Offers(05.06.20).

Friday, July 24, 2020

e- Clerx BUY BACK-- Misuse of Regulations


SMALL INVESTORS’ WELFARE ASSOCIATION

Email : SirenBajao@gmail.com
 Posted on 24th July 2020


TEXT OF LETTER SENT TO SEBI

eCLERX completed recently announce buyback by company in 9 working days ( no buying on 3 days ) as under :
DATE                   QTY
15-7-20                    66,000
16-7-20                   14,00,000
17-7-20                    1,10,814 
20-7-20                     40,000
21-7-20                     3,03,500     
22-7-20                      1,73,501
TOTAL                      20,93,815

The following are very serious observations which SEBI must look into :
1 On detailed scrutiny of large volume on 16-7-20 , we find that out of 1400000 shares purchased by the company,  1126444 shares were purchased from Franklin Templeton Mutual Fund. This constitute 53.79% of maximum buyback size quantity and this is bought from one entity. That too on very second day after buyback of shares was started by the company.
2. This fact about purchase from a single entity should have been disclosed in "Daily Reporting of Shares Bought" by the company which has not been done. 
3. Sebi should have a percentage cap of maximum buy size on buying from one entity.
    Only one or two individuals should not be allowed to benefit of buyback opportunity          extended to all shareholders. Sebi always give preference to minority shareholders.
4. Whether this buyback was announced to bail out troubled Franklin Templeton Fund.
5. Who put order first ? Whether buy order was put first or sell order was put first ? This may bring out Insider Trading violations committed by both party involved,
6. Whether SEBI Regulations needs to be tightened so that companies do not deprive small shareholders the exit opportunity of buyback for which Sebi has permitted a maximum time frame of 6 months to companies to complete the buyback.

UMANATH AGARWAL
   

In tender method special quota of 15% is fixed for small shareholders but in the open market purchase like this more than 50% of the quota was usurped by one single entity.

May we suggest that  
i) there should be a limit of maxium 2% to be bought from one single shareholder during the course of the entire offer and 
ii) in order to allow full opportunity to all the shareholders, no more than 2% of the total amount to be bought can be bought in one single day.

No comments:

Post a Comment