About Me

My photo
The Original CHAUKIDAAR ,“TAKEOVER WATCHMAN” since 2007. CA. Arun Goenka* hands-on experience in the share market* deep knowledge of laws and account*one of the early players, pioneered an investment strategy in TAKEOVERS*The WIRC - of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, has honoured him with the ‘Recognition of CAs in Social Service’. * often invited by National business news; electronic and print media, for his views on SEBI related matters. * history of red-flagging 100+ cases to SEBI* contributes by giving inputs in drafting amendments to the regulation* Some of the suggestions reflected in subsequent regulatory changes: (a). In takeover of Cairn 3,750 Crores non-compete fees waived off and ultimately Removal of Non-compete fee in 2011 (b) November 2009 amending Regulation 11 (1). (c)Listing agreement baring promoters from voting on related party. (d) Disclosure of past performance by merchant bankers in case of IPO (e) SAST 2011 regulation 10(1)(h), (f) Counter Offer in case of Delisting (g) Interest payment to all in case of delays in Open Offers(05.06.20).

Sunday, June 28, 2020

VEDANTA DELISTING AN OPEN LETTER TO SHRI ANIL AGARWAL



28th June 2020

OPEN LETTER TO SHRI ANIL AGARWAL CHAIRMAN VEDANTA GROUP

Shri Anil Agarwal ji,
I write this Open Letter to you because I know about you but do not know you.  For diverse reasons, you and I both want the delisting offer of VEDANTA to succeed. I want the delisting offer to succeed because I believe it is in the interest of small shareholders. Delisting offer gives an exit opportunity  at a reasonable price. If the delisting offer fails, the prices will crash and will lead to heavy losses to the small shareholders. You, of course, must have different reasons and larger plans.
Hope you are concerned that 86% of the persons responding   (not in terms of shareholding)  voted against the delisting.  Although the condition for minimum 25% participation by public shareholders has been diluted, yet a decent number of shareholders should participate. You have 7.8 lakhs shareholders but only 15,903 number of responses were received. 13,756 voted against the Delisting proposal. In other words only 2147 people out of 7.8 lakhs supported you. This gives a dismal 0.28%!!!
What was more surprising to me was that 14.7% institutional votes were cast against delisting. Unlike small investors who think emotionally, institutions are supposed to take a more rational and reasoned decision and prepare a proper file note on the justification of their decision. What could have been their justification for voting against it?
The offer price of Rs.87.50 is the culprit and must be revised immediately. I am sure none of your advisors are telling you, that you will be able to get delisted @ 87.50. You are definitely prepared to pay more. But the investors are not aware. My suggestion to you is to declare an increased Indicative price, say 125 or more, although you are actually prepared to go much higher. If for any reason, you are not in a position to do that because of requirement of increased Escrow deposit, you can at least, make some press statement or a TV interview saying that you will not be averse to accepting higher Exit price, beyond 87.50,  may be 125,  since the market price is much higher.
Anil ji, I am veteran in the share market and focused mainly on Takeovers, Buy-backs and De-listing for more than 2 decades. Almost all such cases are keenly watched by me. Perhaps, you are not aware  that the seed of Counter offer provisions in the delisting offer was sown by me (SEBI never acknowledges such efforts). Copy of my letter dated 30 May 2014 in response to the discussion paper issued by SEBI,can be viewed on my blog-- http://sebi-takeover-watchman.blogspot.com/.  The two main reasons for failure of Delisting offer are:
ü  Sufficient number of shares required to cross the threshold have not been tendered.
ü  The Discovered price and the price at which the required number of shares can be acquired, is very high and unacceptable to the promoter/acquirer.
In the second situation, you will get an opportunity to give a counter offer but that opportunity will be available to you if and only if, the first situation is satisfied, i.e. sufficient number of shares required to be acquired have been received in the offer. It is utmost important for the success of the offer to bring on board the maximum number of shareholders. Let them quote whatever price they want. If the 90% threshold is not crossed, you will not get a chance of making a counter offer.
In the past such issues, promoters/merchant bankers etc. would invariably contact us, but no one contacted me till now. No one has tried to explain to me or motivate me to vote in the Postal ballot or participate in the delisting offer.  This leaves a feeling that either you are overconfident or indifferent.
Your advisors/team need to talk to every single investor at least those holding  over a thousand  shares.  Any complacency on their part will lead to your not being able to reach the threshold of 90%.  They must bring on board, a large number of shareholders. In conclusion 2 things must be done immediately:
A.      Make investors aware that Rs.87.50 is just the indicative price. Final price may be higher. For the purpose you may revise the indicative price higher or make press statement etc. and
B.      Every single investor, at least those holding  over a thousand  shares must be contacted.
If the above is not done the probability of you not reaching the magic number of 90% is very high and your whole plan of delisting and beyond, will collapse. Market sentiments are clearly indicating that..  
Yours truly,
A Small Investor of Vedanta

3 comments:

  1. Arun ji, thx for sharing your thoughts. But some 50% is held by Vedanta global and 35% by institutions. They just need 5% more which is not large and Vedanta may have contacted largest shareholders amongst retail besides institutions. I am not sure if we can draw the inference in the blog because some of us holding 1000+ shares have not been contacted. In case of Vedanta, 1000 shares are just valued at 1.2 lacs, not a large value and there will be thousands of us which makes it difficult for a company to discuss as shareholder level. I may be wrong but this is something that comes to my mind

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with you Sourabh ji, but the thrust of the article is to take care of the Public sentiment in terms of number of Folios, not only in terms of number of shares held, it is so much against AA. Also give some assurance/indication to the public at large that this is a serious exercise and the management is aware that the delisting cannot happen at 87.50

    ReplyDelete